आर्यभूमि

I have been wondering about what demographics changes mean. It seems to me the most insulting thing on humanity. Over the period, since evolution of man kind, the species named homo sapiens have been traveling and settling to places. The current demographics does not mean they belong to the land. Rest of the man made segregations like caste, religion are very new. Mankind, with its quest for knowledge and conquest of land and power, have nomadic approach since long. And nothing has changed. The people from regions, where people cry about Demographic Changes in their places and are not from untouched tribal belts, should immediately be barred from everywhere in the world. Demographics changes everywhere, what's so special about you? If demographics are so important, stay at your place and cut yourself off from rest of the world. PERIOD. Sentinelese people from Andaman and Nicobar are proper example of protecting their demographics. The argument is, the outsiders will ruin the pla

Sushant Singh 's suicide has triggered the nepotism debate in bollywood again. But I have a different view on it.  There  is as a lot of defence in their favour, if we focus only on nepotism. They can name you quite a few outsiders, who are doing well, Shahrukh Khan is one of them. And many insiders who failed. And hence my view is little different. I believe, more than nepotism, bollywood's lobbying is what is in action. And which is more harmful for the talents. "Selective Nepotism", we can name it. By only focusing on nepotism, we also target the talented Akshay Khanna, Hritik Roshan, Vivek Oberoi and the likes. And recent victim, mr. Amitabh Bachchan too. The reason Amitabh still survives, is because of his larger than anyone's image. But don't worry, lobby and politics is at work against Amitabh. You can see, trolls at work on every tweet, every heartfelt messages that he posts. Amitabh is continuously shown in bad light. The news by NDTV after Jayalali

किसी भी महामारी को ना फैलने देने की जिम्मेदारी जनता पर होती है। ये महामारी लोगों से लोगों में फैलती है, तो जिम्मेदारी भी लोगों की ही है। विशेषज्ञ भी यही सलाह देते हैं। सरकारें उन्हीं सलाहों पर अमल करती हैं। ऐसे समय में त्वरित निर्णय लिए जाते हैं, जो सही गलत की कसौटी पर नहीं कसे का सकते, क्यूंकि सही गलत के लिए पूर्व में ऐसी समस्याओं का ज्ञान होना चाहिए। तो सरकारें, दूसरे देशों की, दूसरे प्रांतों की दशा देख कर उचित निर्णय लेती है। यहां व्यावहारिकता और छोटी मोटी असहजता को पैमाने पर नहीं रखा जा सकता, क्यूंकि निर्णय त्वरित होता है, विशेषज्ञों पर भरोसे के आधार पर होता है। किन्तु, सरकारें और प्रशासन आपको केवल दिशा निर्देश दे सकते हैं, कुछ पाबंदियां लगा सकते हैं। इससे ज्यादा वो कुछ खास कर नहीं सकते, खासकर तब जब बीमारी का इलाज मौजूद ना हो। लगभग सभी देशों ने पाबंदियां लगाईं और दिशा निर्देश दिए। मगर वही देश पूर्णतः या अंशतः सफल रहे जहां की जनता कम मूर्ख थी। हमारे लिए बहुत आसान है किसी मुख्यमंत्री या प्रधानमंत्री या राष्ट्रपति पर दोष मढ़ देना, मगर हम ये भूल जाते हैं, सत्ता में बैठे लोग अपने स

The media is responsible for putting any colors to any incident. Racism do exist. I acknowledge it. But there are other supremacist as well.  Police issues are basically being power mad, not necessarily racism. I lived in USA for around 6 years between 2011 to 2017 and I never faced any incident from either cops or white people. Infact, there were two black guys who misbehaved at two different occasions, both the incidents happened in the busiest streets of NYC.  But since I was an Indian and there were a black Americans, the incidents didn't qualified for racism. Had their skin been white, racism would have come into picture. When you live in the USA for long, you expect basic decency and civil behaviour from people there, because that is normal in that part of the world, but NYC streets, some cities in New Jersey, Georgia have a lot of uncivilized souls, both white and black and also blood sucking Asians too. But all of them are individuals. Sometimes collection of individuals. A